Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<F66469FCE9C5D311B8FF0000F8FE9E070F511093@mbtlipnt03.btlabs.bt.co.uk>
From:	hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com
To:	janneke AT gnu DOT org
Cc:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2
Date:	Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:44:18 -0000
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2654.89)
MIME-version:	1.0

Just to confirm that with the latest tetex-20001208-4
and the cygwin texmf-*-* packages I don't need to 
set TEXMFMAIN anymore - although I still have
TEXINPUTS and the font related variables set to
"${HOME}/somewhere//:" for my CJK stuff.

Well-done!

BTW - pdftex in tetex-20001208-4 depends on the 
new (10-days-old) libpng 1.0.2 . One needs to 
upgrade that first - or run the 
/etc/postinstall/*{tetex,texmf}*
scripts again after ungrading libpng. Re-installing
tetex will not re-run the postinstall script for 
some unknown reason.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Nieuwenhuizen [mailto:janneke AT gnu DOT org]
Sent: 29 January 2002 13:46
To: hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: New on sourceware: texmf-20000804-2


hin-tak DOT leung AT idl-bt DOT com writes:

> My Texmf tree came from the stock teTeX 1.0.2

Ok, so you're not using the texmf packages, and not using the latest
tetex-beta...

> Without setting TEXMFMAIN, it looks like latex is trying to look for
> the texmf tree under //share rather than /usr/share .

Could be.

> "TEXMFMAIN = $SELFAUTOPARENT/share/texmf" and my guess is that
> $SELFAUTOPARENT is not set correctly, but this is the only file

Could also be.

> and I can see why the cygwin binaries shouldn't be able to do it
> correctly...

The latest (experimental) tetex-beta + texmf-base packages should get
this right.  You may be looking at bugs that have been fixed, or you
may have some other problem.  Hard to tell.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -