Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 28 Jan 2002 23:01:22 +0000
To:	Mack Lobell <macklobell AT hotmail DOT com>
Cc:	gcc AT gcc DOT gnu DOT org, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Problems building cross compiler on NT
Message-ID:	<20020128230122.GA28425@daikokuya.demon.co.uk>
References:	<F69AOeIiGXix4A2DreB00001250 AT hotmail DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<F69AOeIiGXix4A2DreB00001250@hotmail.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.25i
From:	Neil Booth <neil AT daikokuya DOT demon DOT co DOT uk>

Mack Lobell wrote:-

> Hi,
> 
> i'm trying to build a gcc 3.0.3 cross compiler on a NT machine. Target is 
> powerpc, host is cygwin on a NT 4.0 workstation with SP6.
 
> insn-flags.h:73: warning: carriage return in preprocessing directive
> insn-flags.h:75: warning: carriage return in preprocessing directive
> insn-flags.h:179: warning: carriage return in preprocessing directive

Huh?  As far as I'm aware, that's not a diagnostic that 3.0.3's
preprocessor gives.  After all, a carriage return in a preprocessing
directive is quite normal; it ends it!

Is the bootstrap compiler 2.x?  If so, you might want to try 3.0.3
itself.

Neil.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -