Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C507DE2.FBBD3BC@lapo.it>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2002 22:34:26 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gettimeofday() does not returns usec resolution
References:	<002e01c1a512$877216c0$0fa807d5 AT BRAMSCHE>

> > would give 3-4 microsecond precision on "deltas" but an initial uncertainty of
>              ^^^^^
> > the usual 15 milliseconds or so.
> >
> This is a output of the mentioned profiler. It say about a minimal time of about 1-2 us. May the difference be
> caused by the cygwin.dll overhead ? (We're using the native functions, not gettimeofday()).
>
> [1828] EmptyTest   count:    100  time: (min)          1 [us] (max)          2 [us] (sum)        169 [us]

On my machine it's actually 1.74us, but I made the test on some machines and the result varies from 1.05 to 5.9us
(excluding a single machine for which it takes 11.45us).
That using my own profiles that uses the "adapted gettimeofday(), so it has a ilttle bit more of overhead to
divide it in the secs and usecs fileds.

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -