Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<ECA4D0861693D511A64E00105A46E082030164@superman.crsltd.com>
From:	Sava Zxivanovich <sava DOT zxivanovich AT crsltd DOT com>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Binutil compatibulity
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2002 15:34:56 -0000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

Hi.

I am working with PowerPC 401 D2 - in deed PLX IOP480.

I have installed GCC chain that uses binutil 2.9.1, gcc 2.95.2 for
powerpc-elf.
Due to fact that as in that version do not support one operand - tlbwe,
I have to upgrade to one I hope does support - 2.10.1. I would not like
to use 2.11, I had quit a bad time with it (and GCC 3.0.1).

My question is if binutil 2.10 does support operand tlwbe (PowerPC
Embedded Environment, PowerPC 401D2), would there be any problem if I
configure binutils as ppc-eabi (I suppose yes, I would like just to
check that) and would it be any problem with gcc 2.95.2 (I suppose not,
but you never know).

Why am I asking all this? Well, we are very near to a point where we
would go with commercial compiler. Actually, this is a last cry before
that.

Kind regards,
Sava

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -