Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C4F64B4.380E84AF@lapo.it>
Date:	Thu, 24 Jan 2002 02:34:44 +0100
From:	Lapo Luchini <lapo AT lapo DOT it>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language:	it,en,fr,es,ja
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: gettimeofday() does not returns usec resolution
References:	<00af01c1a3de$7af04b40$60a407d5 AT BRAMSCHE> <3C4E6FD1 DOT 9060505 AT computer DOT org> <20020123172718 DOT GE6765 AT redhat DOT com> <3C4F01DF DOT 70AA4F00 AT lapo DOT it> <20020123190335 DOT GC18042 AT redhat DOT com>

> Hmm.  I do remember this patch.  Can you submit this to cygwin-patches
> in the correct format: http://cygwin.com/contrib.html ?

Given enough time, yes (never hacked that one, but it seems that only
winsup/cygwin/times.cc would need to be modified).. anyway of course I'm one of
the few that actually would like to have this feature so I guess there's no big
hurry.

Of course the number reported by PerformanceTimer has an unknown offset with
system time (it appears to start at 0 at program start, but that's not clearly
specified) so I would have calculate an initial "offset" in the "old" way... this
would give 3-4 microsecond precision on "deltas" but an initial uncertainty of
the usual 15 milliseconds or so.

I guess that it's better that having that uncertainty between ANY two
measurations... but if someone has some other idea.. please suggest =)

> Do you have an assignment on file with Red Hat?

Sorry but english knowledge doesn't let me understand "assignment on file", could
you explain it to me with other words?

> >-------
> >int gettimeofday(struct timeval *tv, struct timezone *tz)
> >{....
> >}
> >------------

A note for everyone: that implementation was taken from tim Prince's message on
lmbench and of course lacked any syncronization with real time as was used only
for deltas.

--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
lapo AT lapo DOT it (PGP & X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN: 529796)


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -