Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From:	"Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de>
To:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Cc:	"Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
Subject:	RE: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
Date:	Wed, 23 Jan 2002 08:26:17 +0100
Message-ID:	<00b001c1a3df$3f676620$60a407d5@BRAMSCHE>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
In-Reply-To:	<003501c17dce$b53a8210$7add18ac@amr.corp.intel.com>
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance:	Normal

Hi Tim,
Sorry for late answer, I was busy with other things. Should the link below help with this ? We (the kde-cygwin
team) are using this for a special profiling lib for profiling the kde2 port.

http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-rt1/

Ralf Habacker
kde on cygwin http://kde-cygwin.sf.net


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tim Prince [mailto:tprince AT computer DOT org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2001 9:36 PM
> To: Ralf Habacker; Cygwin
> Subject: Re: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
>
>
>
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Tim Prince [mailto:tprince AT computer DOT org]
> > > Sent: Sunday, December 02, 2001 10:58 PM
> > > To: Ralf Habacker
> > > Cc: Cygwin
> > > Subject: Re: Old Thread: Cygwin Performance
> > >
> > >
> The QueryPerformance() calls are still giving 1.00 second timing resolution
> on an AthlonMP box (should be better than 10 microseconds on most other
> boxes, with correct usage), but their use appears to be truer to the
> original lmbench than the cygwin gettimeofday() with its 1.00 second
> resolution.
>
> I believed there were deficiencies in the way lmbench uses
> QueryPerformance(), preserving only 31 bits of clock ticks from the time of
> initialization, but I didn't succeed in showing any better way.
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -