Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<003b01c1a2d6$79d5f290$6401a8c0@TOMSLAPTOP>
From:	"Tom Broadbent" <tombroadbent AT sbcglobal DOT net>
To:	"Larry Hall \(RFK Partners, Inc\)" <lhall AT rfk DOT com>,
	"Pavel Tsekov" <ptsekov AT syntrex DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<000901c1a27a$03cf9490$6401a8c0 AT TOMSLAPTOP> <3C4C205D DOT 5000609 AT syntrex DOT com> <001101c1a286$91b1f1c0$6401a8c0 AT TOMSLAPTOP> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20020121174615 DOT 016bcde8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com>
Subject:	Re: wildcard for tcsh
Date:	Mon, 21 Jan 2002 15:50:47 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400

well if the truth be known...

in the begining i didn't even *know* what 'mailing list archives' to look
through.
my response to mr. Pavel Tsekov was a personal email, meant to be
taken light heartedly, and was, incidentally,  a form of a 'thank-you'
for his answer to my question (see below).

i agree that it is more effective to look through the already answered
questions.  had i known *where* to start maybe i wouldn't have
posted to this list!  i saw the 'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com' email address
*while* i was searching on 'google' trying to find an answer
to the wildcard question... and supposed that someone in support over
at cygwin would get it and respond.  i admit i was confused and sorely
mistaken.

so i apologize *profusely* for wasting your time.

again i thank mr. Tsekov for his answer (not for forwarding my response
on to the rest of you on this list).

and thank you mr Larry Hall for your correction.  i'll try much harder to be
more
courtious in the future.

so unless someone else has a comment about this already very dead horse,
i'll
continue in peace the project that i was working on when i first had the
question
about wildcards.

thank you all and have a nice day.

one last thing - i just tried searching the mailing list and the answer
popped
up so easily!!  thanks so much for teaching me this valuable resource!!


> >No need to e-mail me personally. Hope you'll get
> >your answer the next time too.
> >
> >Tom Broadbent wrote:
> >
> >>>No trouble at all! :)
> >>>
> >>>Check this: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-12/msg01272.html
> >>>
> >>>Next time try to search the mailing list archives.
> >>
> >>no thanks - i'd rather wait for an answer from somebody.
> >>thanks for the answer!
>
>
>
> And Tom, most people here would rather you avail yourself of the
> existing resources before adding to the volume of this list with
> a potentially asked-and-answered question.  It's common courtesy.
> I hope you'll keep that in mind.




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -