delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2002/01/19/10:32:08

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 10:32:18 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: OFF-TOPIC, but...
Message-ID: <20020119153218.GC6450@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <20020119050606 DOT GA4649 AT redhat DOT com> <00ac01c1a0dc$69cbfcb0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <00ac01c1a0dc$69cbfcb0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Sat, Jan 19, 2002 at 10:28:26PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>
>===
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Christopher Faylor" <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
>To: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 4:06 PM
>Subject: OFF-TOPIC, but...
>
>>I thought I might as well be the first person to post this:
>>
>>http://www.washtech.com/news/media/14759-1.html
>>
>>This was, of course, news to me.
>>
>>One would wonder what this means for Cygwin.  I think the definitive
>>answer would be "Cygwin?  Huh?  What's that?"
>
>Are you suggesting the community should prepare to find a new home?
>Wouldn't AOL actually like cygwin as a transition tool - reading
>between the lines of that news clipping...

It's way too early for me to be suggesting anything.

When Red Hat acquired Cygnus, the response to "What are you going to
do about Cygwin" was basically "Hmm.  That's a very good question..."
rustle, rustle, rustle <whisper> "What the heck is Cygwin?"

I assume that, if this rumored negotiation is true, Cygwin hasn't
entered the radar yet and may never enter it, even though it does
occasionally make some money for Red Hat.

Regardless, I'm sure I'll be able to find a home for Cygwin somewhere.
I doubt that sources.redhat.com is going anywhere...

"Contributions gratefully accepted."  :-)

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019