Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 15 Jan 2002 12:34:57 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ksh on cygwin
Message-ID:	<20020115173457.GB28211@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20020112033912 DOT GB5052 AT redhat DOT com> <DIENLECHGMDAEJHGMEBCGEDECBAA DOT Karsten DOT Fleischer AT gmx DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DIENLECHGMDAEJHGMEBCGEDECBAA.Karsten.Fleischer@gmx.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Jan 15, 2002 at 05:45:16PM +0100, Karsten Fleischer wrote:
>> I'm just asking for assurances.
>>
>> Can you get someone from AT&T to send email here saying that they have
>> no interest in your changes?  That + your assignment will be enough for
>> me.
>
>Glenn Fowler and David Korn will prepare a message. Is that OK? Or must an
>AT&T lawyer be involved?

As long as the person thinks they have the right to send the message, I'm happy.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -