Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C3E328B.4080403@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:32:11 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Jon Leichter <jon AT symas DOT com>
CC:	earnie_boyd AT yahoo DOT com, hschwentner AT yahoo DOT com, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Compiling apps to Mingw32 with cygwin
References:	<DLEBJKNCNLJEDKMKICHGCENLCBAA DOT jon AT symas DOT com>

Jon Leichter wrote:


> It's true that I don't usually patch the script myself and send it back. In
> some cases, there isn't any organization to send the patches back to, e.g.
> GDBM. This is not an unsubstaniated statement. I sent patches to GDBM years
> ago, and nothing ever came of it.


What patches?  Do they affect functionality, or just the build process? 
  If  <phil AT cs DOT wwu DOT edu> and  <downsj AT downsj DOT com>  aren't interested, we 
can at least add them to cygwin's gdbm if they provide important bugfixes...

--Chuck
cygwin gdbm maintainer



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -