Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:07:19 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ksh on cygwin
Message-ID:	<20020110160719.GB24820@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<200201101551 DOT g0AFp8d03682 AT dymwsm09 DOT mailwatch DOT com> <20020110170326 DOT R12057 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020110170326.R12057@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 05:03:26PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> , so I've rewritten the code from memory after looking at the sources.
>> The differences are substancial, so no problem here either.
>
>I think that's ok.  "Rewritten" should be enough.  IANAL, IANAL, ...

If you've actually looked at the UWIN sources, this is not enough.  IANAL
either, but I believe that this means you've been tainted.  That means
that we can't use your patches.  Sorry.

I hope I am misinterpreting what you said incorrectly...

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -