Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:05:19 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: ksh on cygwin
Message-ID:	<20020110160519.GA24820@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<200201101259 DOT g0ACxFN12728 AT dymwsm10 DOT mailwatch DOT com> <20020110144551 DOT J12057 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<20020110144551.J12057@cygbert.vinschen.de>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Jan 10, 2002 at 02:45:51PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>> Is it OK to send patches to 1.3.3-2 or should I move them to 1.3.6 first?
>
>I would suggest to move them to the latest from CVS.  If you're
>always working against the latest from CVS you don't get hit too
>much by changes from other people.

Yes.  This is a requirement.  Latest CVS.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -