Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Reply-To:	<nhv AT cape DOT com>
From:	"Norman Vine" <nhv AT cape DOT com>
To:	"'Jason Tishler'" <jason AT tishler DOT net>,
	"'Cygwin'" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
Cc:	"'Roth, Kevin P.'" <KPRoth AT MarathonOil DOT com>
Subject:	RE: rebase for setup (curl)
Date:	Fri, 4 Jan 2002 14:02:01 -0500
Message-ID:	<008e01c19552$4b6bd6e0$a300a8c0@nhv>
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2232.26
In-Reply-To:	<20020104185355.GA2172@dothill.com>
Importance:	Normal
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

Jason Tishler writes:
>>
>So, the options passed to ld are the same for cygcurl-2.dll and pq.dll
>except for the slight variation of --base-file versus --image-base.
>
>I decided to table the search for the "offending" ld option(s) because
>of the following gloomy thought:
>
>    Given that rebase can break certain DLLs and that it is nearly
>    impossible to control how arbitrary packages create their DLLs,
>    can setup.exe's proposed rebase solution deal with this problem?
>    Or, is the rebase solution doomed to failure?
>
>Does anyone have any bright ideas?

What happens if you link with
--enable-auto-image-base   ??

Cheers

Norman

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -