delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | "Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de> |
To: | "Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com> |
Subject: | RE: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected |
Date: | Wed, 2 Jan 2002 11:09:02 +0100 |
Message-ID: | <003101c19375$80ca1ab0$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE> |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
X-Priority: | 3 (Normal) |
X-MSMail-Priority: | Normal |
X-Mailer: | Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0 |
In-Reply-To: | <20020102110451.F27340@cygbert.vinschen.de> |
X-MimeOLE: | Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 |
Importance: | Normal |
> -----Original Message----- > From: cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com [mailto:cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com]On Behalf > Of Corinna Vinschen > Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 11:05 AM > To: Cygwin > Subject: Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected > > > On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 12:57:25AM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote: > > Thanks for this hints. While porting kdelibs I have had to explicity closed and > delete the > > socket file before I can bound to it (which wasn't used under other ported os) > and as I found > > the decribed code in the bind() function, the first thoughts was that this may be the > > problem. After this correction I will look at the kde code to identify the > called functions. > > Perhaps the problem is the getsockname(). > > I have checked in a fix to getsockname() to return the correct result > for AF_LOCAL/AF_UNIX sockets as well. You can find it in the current > sources from CVS. > > > After looking in the code I have an additional question. Does cygwin and linux > differs in the > > possibilites of deleting of open files ? This could be a difference, because I have found > > that before binding an unlink() is made, but fails. > > The usual Win32/Posix difference: You can't unlink a file on Win32 > which is still in use. That's it. Thanks > Corinna > > -- > Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to > Cygwin Developer mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com > Red Hat, Inc. > > -- > Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple > Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html > Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html > FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ > > -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |