Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 31 Dec 2001 14:12:32 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: duplicate regexec/regcomp functions detected
Message-ID:	<20011231191232.GA2796@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<20011231171737 DOT GC1801 AT redhat DOT com> <000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5 AT BRAMSCHE>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<000b01c1922d$3f42ca90$865c07d5@BRAMSCHE>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 07:59:15PM +0100, Ralf Habacker wrote:
>> Why would you infer that?  You ran 'nm' over cygdll.a.  Does that mean that all of the
>> symbols from cygdll.a were part of libpthread.a?
>> 
>No, only the symbols, which are defined in pthread.o, called the "reflib" in speclib. 

And why couldn't you do the same thing with cygwin.din?

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -