Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<012101c18fa6$a81c61e0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<00b001c17081$fd7ffc80$10870518 AT rdondo1 DOT ca DOT home DOT com> <3BF83C82 DOT 5010109 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011119001720 DOT GA20633 AT redhat DOT com> <003b01c17090$c521c210$578208d2 AT itdomain DOT net DOT au> <3BF88E1C DOT 80103 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <010701c18fa6$4f07aa10$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
Subject:	Re: few more questions
Date:	Sat, 29 Dec 2001 00:50:47 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Dec 2001 13:50:48.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[A7F774C0:01C18FA6]

Answering my own comment...

Digging back into the thread for completeness, Chris suggested you send
your one-question per email assertion to ESR for inclusion. I concur,
because while it's an obvious corollary to a hacker, it's likely to be
non obvious to those who will gain the most benefit from the essay in
the first place.

Rob
===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Saturday, December 29, 2001 12:48 AM
Subject: Re: few more questions


> Just cleaning up my mailbox, found this unansewered...
>
> I took the single question pre mail as a corollary to
> "Use meaningful, specific subject headers". If you have two
questions(*)
> then a meaningful specific subject header becomes much less likely.
>
> (*) Questions in the sense of a group of tightly bound statements and
> requests, not in the sense of a single sentence with a '?' tacked on
the
> end.
>
> Rob
>
> ===
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
> To: "Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
> Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 3:44 PM
> Subject: Re: few more questions
>
>
> > Robert Collins wrote:
> >
> > > IIRC it is in the ESR document. Hmm.
> >
> >
> > Well, he says hackers don't like open-ended time sinks.  He also
says
> > subject lines should be descriptive.  But I *don't* see where he
says
> that
> > a single message should not contain multiple questions.  Wanna give
me
> the
> > section reference where he says that?
> >
> > --Chuck
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
>
>


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -