Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Thu, 27 Dec 2001 21:53:30 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Potential problems with cygwin GCC and -mno-cygwin switch
Message-ID:	<20011228025330.GA27140@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<04b501c18f48$3e2da2c0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <DLEBJKNCNLJEDKMKICHGEENKCAAA DOT jon AT symas DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<DLEBJKNCNLJEDKMKICHGEENKCAAA.jon@symas.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 06:46:25PM -0800, Jon Leichter wrote:
>>From: Robert Collins [mailto:robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au]
>>However , once gcc's specs are changed linking with the libraries they
>>provide will fail - which is what I was talking about.
>
>Hmm...  I'm not sure why this would be the case.  I have relocated my
>libraries, and I have updated my specs file.  Things work just fine for
>me (or it seems).  I wonder if you could elaborate your assertion with
>an example.  (I don't want to upset Chris Faylor - is this something we
>should discuss off the mailing list?)

I'm not a censor.  If you are discussing something that deals with
cygwin feel free to do it here.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -