Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<045401c18f33$844d7f60$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Jason Tishler" <jason AT tishler DOT net>,
	"Ralf Habacker" <Ralf DOT Habacker AT freenet DOT de>
Cc:	"Cygwin" <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<000c01c18e49$22279220$526307d5 AT BRAMSCHE> <20011227180503 DOT GD2204 AT dothill DOT com>
Subject:	Re: rebase addon - Bas and Size listing of dll's without rebasing
Date:	Fri, 28 Dec 2001 11:06:35 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	28 Dec 2001 00:06:26.0582 (UTC) FILETIME=[7E293B60:01C18F33]

===
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jason Tishler" <jason AT tishler DOT net>
> After the above is completed, then I would entertain adding such an
> option if the community deemed it appropriate.  But, wouldn't
> implementing it via ReBaseImage()'s fReBase parameter as opposed to
> plucking certain bytes out of the executable be a better approach?  I
> presume that this is how MS implements their '-s' (just sum image
range)
> option.

IMO we should be using bfd not the MS helper libraries - in the long
term. Otherwise one cannot do any of this as part of a cross compile or
cross-manipulation toolkit.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -