Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<004101c18e9b$33e70de0$67ec85ce@amr.corp.intel.com>
From:	"Tim Prince" <tprince AT computer DOT org>
To:	"Fractal A." <fractala AT yahoo DOT com>, "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>,
	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
References:	<20011226163118 DOT 54634 DOT qmail AT web12203 DOT mail DOT yahoo DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Bison 1.30
Date:	Wed, 26 Dec 2001 21:56:12 -0800
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200

----- Original Message -----
From: "Fractal A." <fractala AT yahoo DOT com>
To: "Randall R Schulz" <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>; <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Cc: <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 8:31 AM
Subject: Re: Bison 1.30


> Hi,
>
> Because the compiler (bison 1.28) appears to be working incorrectly, I
believe
> that a newer version of bison might solve the problem.  I don't know why
the
> "implicit declaration" error is occurring.  I don't know what to do to
solve
> it.  The arithmetic.lex and arithmetic.y files were compiling properly
before.
> When the other files started outputting the "implicit declaration" error,
it
> seems that everything stopped working correctly.  The error is of the type
> "implicit declaration" of several different yy functions.  If you think of
> something to help, please let me know.  Thanks.
>
> Examples of the error:
> Errors of this nature cause me to believe that the compiler is failing.
>
> C:\cygwin2\c15>g++ -Wall -c -gstabs ch1-05.y.tab.c
> /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `int yyparse()':
> /usr/share/bison.simple:358: implicit declaration of function `int
> yyerror(...)'
>
> C:\cygwin2\ega>g++ -Wall -c -gstabs arithmetic.y.tab.c
> /usr/share/bison.simple: In function `int yyparse()':
> /usr/share/bison.simple:361: implicit declaration of function `int
free(...)'
>
> =====
> Fractal A.                    fractala AT yahoo DOT com
What evidence do you have that bison would make a sudden change from its
traditional form?  If it hasn't adapted to the C89 style in over 10 years,
why now?  You ask gcc for warning messages, gcc complies.  What chance would
the cygwin developers have of changing bison, even if they wished to do so?


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -