Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	"Gerrit P. Haase" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: experimental texmf packages
References:	<m3bshtmxhb DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<878764062 DOT 20011128173421 AT nyckelpiga DOT de>
	<m37ks9lgxi DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<4434079433 DOT 20011129221637 AT familiehaase DOT de>
	<m3oflgy98n DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<9517228633 DOT 20011203135833 AT familiehaase DOT de>
	<m3lmgkwgeu DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <3C0D8535 DOT D67735D1 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
	<m33d2pam3l DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<00d501c17d93$1936c990$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<m3zo4x7obb DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <3C0E5FE5 DOT 9040908 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
	<m3g06o3gia DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <3C0F99CF DOT 3010309 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Organization:	Jan at Appel
From:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>
Date:	06 Dec 2001 17:27:29 +0100
In-Reply-To:	<3C0F99CF.3010309@ece.gatech.edu> (Charles Wilson's message of "Thu, 06 Dec 2001 11:16:15 -0500")
Message-ID:	<m3vgfkl3f2.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
Lines:	26
User-Agent:	Gnus/5.090003 (Oort Gnus v0.03) Emacs/21.1
MIME-Version:	1.0

Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> writes:

> You're in bsd-ports "make world" mode, I see.  I don't think that is a 
> goal, yet.  *OUR* concern is "make cygwin work".

Yes, I guess our priorities don't match.  I've been in "make world"
mode since the b20 days; I needed to build some core development
packages and package additional (possibly unmaintained) packages.
And, I didn't want to do too much manual work for each update of a
package, maintained or unmaintained.

> > Now for something constructive.  What if I fix my scripts to do the
> > new convention, and we run that over the archive to rebuild everything?
> 
> Be my guest...but remember those "corner cases" I mentioned?  square 
> peg, round hole?

Yes, I guess you're right.  Indeed, that's why I have the
lots-of-scripts package: to make each peg round by hand.  Then hope it
will fit with the next release of a package too.

Jan.

-- 
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien       | http://www.lilypond.org


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -