Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-Id:	<5.1.0.14.2.20011204131715.027956b8@pop3.cris.com>
X-Sender:	rrschulz AT pop3 DOT cris DOT com
X-Mailer:	QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1
Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2001 13:18:42 -0800
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
From:	Randall R Schulz <rrschulz AT cris DOT com>
Subject:	Re: Speaking of debian cygwin
In-Reply-To:	<3C0D2982.1000503@ece.gatech.edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Charles,

Are they so upset they got the article pulled? All I get, beyond the 
Slahsdot page adornments, is this:

         "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

Has this article been pulled, or is there an error in the URL you gave?

Randall Schulz
Mountain View, CA USA


At 11:52 2001-12-04, Charles Wilson wrote:
>There's another slashdot article:
>
>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/04/13552388
>
>Seems the debian-devel folks aren't too happy about this...
>
>--Chuck


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -