Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2001 16:06:00 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Speaking of debian cygwin
Message-ID:	<20011204210600.GG19946@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com, cygwin-xfree AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C0D2982 DOT 1000503 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C0D2982.1000503@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 02:52:34PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
>There's another slashdot article:
>
>http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/12/04/13552388
>
>Seems the debian-devel folks aren't too happy about this...

I'm surprised that this has actually finally happened.  This has been in
discussion for *years*.  I've been subscribed to the mailing list which
discusses debian for win32 and it has gone through the standard ebbs and
flows of a project that was apparently going nowhere.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -