Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 14:08:19 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: incorrect terminfo link in /lib and /usr/lib
Message-ID:	<20011203190819.GC5307@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3C0BA215 DOT 918B624F AT acm DOT org>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C0BA215.918B624F@acm.org>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 11:02:29AM -0500, Tom Porcher wrote:
>I think I see the problem here.  On my installation of Cygwin (1.3.5),
>the link in /usr/lib is:
>
>    /usr/lib/terminfo -> ../share/terminfo
>
>This link is fine for /usr/lib, where "../share/terminfo" resolves to
>"/usr/share/terminfo".  But referencing the same link from /lib:
>
>    /lib/terminfo -> ../share/terminfo
>
>results in a dead link, because "/share/terminfo" does not exist.
>
>The link should be an absolute link to "/usr/share/terminfo" and not
>a relative link such as it is.

No.  It shouldn't.  It works fine as it is.  Just don't refer to
/lib/terminfo.  Any legacy software that still uses terminfo in its
old location will use /usr/lib/terminfo.

This is not a big deal.  It doesn't deserve a long thread on this
mailing list.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -