Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C0BB7B3.5090708@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Mon, 03 Dec 2001 12:34:43 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010914
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Tom Porcher <porcher AT acm DOT org>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: incorrect terminfo link in /lib and /usr/lib
References:	<3C0BA215 DOT 918B624F AT acm DOT org>
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)

Tom Porcher wrote:

> I think I see the problem here.  On my installation of Cygwin (1.3.5),
> the link in /usr/lib is:
> 
>     /usr/lib/terminfo -> ../share/terminfo
> 
> This link is fine for /usr/lib, where "../share/terminfo" resolves to
> "/usr/share/terminfo".  But referencing the same link from /lib:
> 
>     /lib/terminfo -> ../share/terminfo
> 
> results in a dead link, because "/share/terminfo" does not exist.
> 
> The link should be an absolute link to "/usr/share/terminfo" and not
> a relative link such as it is.


Probably.  But I *used* to do it that way, and I vaugely remember that 
it caused problems.  But I don't remember what.  Can anybody recall, or 
am I just blowing smoke?

--Chuck
terminfo maintainer



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -