Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT cygwin DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT cygwin DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Date:	Mon, 3 Dec 2001 07:49:33 -0500
From:	Jason Tishler <jason AT tishler DOT net>
To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	Horak Daniel <horak AT sit DOT plzen-city DOT cz>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
Message-ID:	<20011203074933.C2808@dothill.com>
Mail-Followup-To:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>,
	Horak Daniel <horak AT sit DOT plzen-city DOT cz>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3C067330.8000802@ece.gatech.edu>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.18i

Chuck,

[Sorry for the sluggish response time...]

On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 12:41:04PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
> Horak Daniel wrote:
> 
> > > What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun?
> > 
> > There is a check for union semun in configure and then if it does not
> > find a system wide union semun it defines its own as
> > 
> > [snip]
> Ah, then cygipc-1.11 won't work for postgresql.  Cygwin (and Linux) 
> implementations of IPC need a fourth union memeber,
> [snip]
> This sounds like a vote for 'return to 1.10 behavior'.  Any other comments?

I just tried the simplistic approach: configure, make, make check.
PostgreSQL 7.1.3 builds cleanly and passes all regression tests.  So it
seems that cygipc 1.11 is still compatible with PostgreSQL.

Thanks,
Jason

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -