Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/29/10:25:53
Windows NT Ver 4.0 build 1381 Service Pack 5, but it looks like this is
intended behavior... see hash::add_subdirs in
...\winsup\cinstall\install.cc, ca. line 170.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul G. [SMTP:pgarceau AT qwest DOT net]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 4:56 PM
> To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject: RE: gcc not creating .exe
>
> Platform?
>
> On 28 Nov 2001 at 10:38, Polley Christopher W wrote:
>
> > This statement isn't entirely true. I just did an experiment
> reinstalling
> > only bash, then ash; deleting before each time my /usr/local/bin,
> > /usr/local/etc, and /usr/local/lib directories.
> >
> > Although no packages explicitly contain the /usr/local directory
> (according
> > to http://cygwin.com/packages/), on these reinstalls, the
> /usr/local/bin,
> > /usr/local/etc, and /usr/local/lib directories are created (empty)
> > (suprisingly, even if /usr/local is marked read-only)
> >
> > So while there isn't anything installed under /usr/local, the mere
> existence
> > of a /usr/local tree doesn't, apparently, indicate an installation
> problem
> > (unless I'm doing something wrong... )
> >
>
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -