delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/28/23:29:46

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20011128233313.0082ccd0@pop.ne.mediaone.net>
X-Sender: phumblet AT pop DOT ne DOT mediaone DOT net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32)
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:33:13 -0500
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
From: "Pierre A. Humblet" <Pierre DOT Humblet AT ieee DOT org>
Subject: Re: can not install libwww-perl-5.61
Mime-Version: 1.0

Is it a dbm problem or is the following coincidental? 

main()
{
	DBM *dbp;
	dbp = dbm_open("xxx", O_RDWR|O_CREAT, 0644);
	if (dbp == NULL) perror("dbm_open");
}
yields:
dbm_open: Permission denied

http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg01391.html reported
> robot/rules-dbm.....Can't open test-436657: Permission denied at
robot/rules-dbm.t line 9


Cygnus Win95/NT Configuration Diagnostics
Windows 98 SE Ver 4.10 build 67766446  A 

Cygwin DLL version info:
        DLL version: 1.3.5
        DLL epoch: 19

Pierre

*********
From: "Gerrit P. Haase" <freeweb at nyckelpiga dot de> 
To: "Arkadi Gelfond" <arkadig at usa dot net> 
Cc: "Gerrit P. Haase" <cygwin at cygwin dot com>, cpan-testers at cpan dot
org 
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 16:28:33 +0100 

Hallo Arkadi,

2001-11-21 16:25:01, du schriebst:

> Gerrit,
>     sorry, for not providing enough details:

> Perl 5.6.1 the distribution that currently comes with Cygwin.

5.6.1-1 or 5.6.1-2?

> After sending mail to this list I noticed the new Cygwin version:
> cygwin-1.3.5-3, so I installed it and then tried to install LWP again and
> failed again.

> 'Works for me' - is it under W98?

No, NT4.0 Sp6a

Why should it fail on Win98?  There are no permissions which can be denied?
I have no idea.  Unfortunately my wife has accidently clobbered my Win98
installation with a Linux evaluation CD last weekend, now she is running
Win2K on her box;)

Gerrit


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019