Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 20:45:10 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: which getopt.c is cygwin1.dll using?
Message-ID:	<20011129014510.GA10594@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<EB19A8A38B497D4FA6C88EADE3A8607F125F38 AT cf-bay-exch-04 DOT cacheflow DOT com>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<EB19A8A38B497D4FA6C88EADE3A8607F125F38@cf-bay-exch-04.cacheflow.com>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.23.1i

On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 05:37:03PM -0800, Downey, Nathan wrote:
>I wasnt trying to be accusing. :) BTW: forgot to run my spellchecker through
>the last post, me bad.

I didn't think that you were trying to be accusing.

I was hoping that you might use that as a goad to actually do a little
research, since this is one of those many cygwin issues that have
already been discussed in this mailing list.

It's also one of the hundreds of cases where we make a change because
someone complains that they can't compile package foo and after the
change someone complains that they can't build package bar.

In other words, we can never win.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -