Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3C052AC5.1090905@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:19:49 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011019 Netscape6/6.2
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Horak Daniel <horak AT sit DOT plzen-city DOT cz>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
References:	<D5637E9568BDF3499B8BB02C12B4461DC8C9 AT EXCHANGE DOT mmp DOT plzen-city DOT cz>

Horak Daniel wrote:

>>
>>1)  postgresql folks: does this work for you?
>>
> 
> PostgreSQL has a check for existence of union semun and can live without
> system-wide union semun.
 

Okay, but that brings us back to the thing that I don't understand: if 
there is no system-wide union semun, then application code MUST define 
it exactly the way the underlying library wants (which says to me, it 
ought to BE in the library's header...)

What does postgresql do if there is no system-wide union semun?

--Chuck



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -