Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
content-class:	urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	RE: [ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.4712.0
Date:	Wed, 28 Nov 2001 17:40:33 +0100
Message-ID:	<D5637E9568BDF3499B8BB02C12B4461DC8C9@EXCHANGE.mmp.plzen-city.cz>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic:	[ANN][RFC] cygipc-1.11 at cygutils
Thread-Index:	AcF3Bgmh/oepvoURQU+mqik2f74PLABJUoVQ
From:	=?US-ASCII?Q?Horak_Daniel?= <horak AT sit DOT plzen-city DOT cz>
To:	<cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fASGjZR23885

> So, did I do the right thing?  Should I try to match SUSv2 or Linux? 
> Also, I have some concerns about passing a union as a 
> variable arg...can 
> you really DO that?  I mean, it compiles and all, and SEEMS 
> to work, but...
> 
> Questions:
> 
> 1)  postgresql folks: does this work for you?

PostgreSQL has a check for existence of union semun and can live without
system-wide union semun.

> 
> 2)  should I go back to Linux style (define union semun in sem.h, 
> require four args on semctl())


			Dan

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -