Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<BF35D9C143BCCC4EB63181B67C9320C83A9AD6@serv-075.icon-germany.local>
From:	Heribert Dahms <heribert_dahms AT icon-scm DOT com>
To:	"'Robert Collins'" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>,
	Charles Wilson
	<cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	Mark Jones <mark_umr AT excite DOT com>,
	Stephano Mariani
	<sk DOT cygml AT btinternet DOT com>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	RE: New Install May Have a Bug
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2001 23:38:02 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)

what do you think about categories like minimal, typical, (custom), full,
new,
with typical as default?

Bye, Heribert (heribert_dahms AT icon-scm DOT com)

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Robert Collins [SMTP:robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au]
> Sent:	Tuesday, November 27, 2001 23:26
> To:	Charles Wilson
> Cc:	Mark Jones; Stephano Mariani; cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
> Subject:	Re: New Install May Have a Bug
> 
> On Wed, 2001-11-28 at 08:28, Charles Wilson wrote:
> > Mark Jones wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > First, thanks for the reply.
> > > 
> > > I understand the reasoning behind the choice, but I would suggest
> adding a
> > > little more to the standard of minimum.  Users of any UNIX like system
> > > expect more/less to be present.  I think it will turn people off, and
> Linux
> > > users that install it will figure the install failed to work properly
> (like
> > > my friend and I did) or will think Cygwin just doesn't have less or
> more
> > > ported over to it and assume that Cygwin is not mature yet.
> > > 
> > > That is my thoughts on the matter.
> > 
> > 
> > That's probably not a bad idea.  Robert (Chris? Who maintains less?), 
> > should 'less' be added to the Base package?
> 
> I don't think so. Once someone creates a metapackage, or I get the
> clickable categories done, then the sensible user default becaomes
> possible. The issue is that base really needs to be the _base_, not the
> 'end user default' - because some users may want less installed. (No pun
> intended).
>  
> Rob

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -