Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<024e01c172d0$45fce450$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Robert Collins" <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Cc:	"Corinna Vinschen" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>, <cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
References:	<009f01c17214$9d03d130$3396e4c2 AT MONTEZUMA> <4 DOT 3 DOT 1 DOT 2 DOT 20011120204158 DOT 0217cef8 AT pop DOT ma DOT ultranet DOT com> <20011121103409 DOT G21630 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <002a01c17270$1641a8f0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BFBEDA2 DOT 5050003 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
Subject:	Re: cygintl.dll missing
Date:	Thu, 22 Nov 2001 08:05:38 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	21 Nov 2001 21:05:33.0152 (UTC) FILETIME=[42243E00:01C172D0]

----- Original Message -----
From: "Charles Wilson" <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
> Well, the *real* problem here is that gettext-0.10.38-2's cygintl.dll
> exports some symbols that gettext-0.10.35p1-2's cygintl.dll does not.
> Therefore, 38's dll is backward compatibile with apps that use
35p1-2's
> DLL, but 35p1-2 is not *forward* compatible.

It exports the new symbols, but what I wnat to know - why does vim use
them? Are they used in the same #defines that previously used older
symbols?

> I don't know how to solve this problem.  The libtool versioning scheme
> -- as mapped to the windows dll structure -- implies that the version
> number should NOT change when symbols are ADDED to the interface,
right?
...
Yes, and I still think that reasononing is correct. It means that having
the newest .dll on the system will work for all apps linked to that dll
name. Even linux doesn't guarantee forward compatability. (i.e. having
an older library than a program needs won't work. Having a newer one
will work for old binaries).

...
> So, to repeat: this illustrates a problem with gettext (more globally,
> with dll versioning on windows) but I don't know how to solve it.
> Except "update your gettext package". Sigh.

Yup. It's a wonderful world :]. Seriously though, I don't percieve this
as an issue. What I see as an issue is setup.exe not allowing
package-version constraints on dependencies. And thats *my* problem :}.

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -