Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BF79BF0.36BAFCC7@wapme-systems.de>
Date:	Sun, 18 Nov 2001 12:30:56 +0100
From:	Stipe Tolj <tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de>
Organization:	Wapme Systems AG
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [de]C-CCK-MCD QXW0322b (WinNT; I)
X-Accept-Language:	de,en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
CC:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re: no more package moratorium?
References:	<F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21 AT hotmail DOT com> <007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de> <m3n11oth6o DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <3BF44A45 DOT 9DA8A866 AT wapme-systems DOT de> <06bc01c16e2a$a7061500$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF44EFA DOT E5ABCA5B AT wapme-systems DOT de> <06fc01c16e2d$7169d730$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks> <3BF450A3 DOT 2FEFAB14 AT wapme-systems DOT de> <004201c16e3b$5afc1400$578208d2 AT itdomain DOT net DOT au>

> I'd very much doubt that Chris would be happy with http basic authentication
> given it's security issues, unless wrapped in SSL. And doing that takes CPU
> which I understand sources.redhat.com to be a little short on right now.

right, SSL-enabling for webdav based uploading and package maintaince
would be easily to implement. I agree with CPU time issue on
sources.redhat.com, that's why I suggest an independant machine for
the whole Cygwin project.

> However, this is not my decision. I just think that a database with web
> interface for maintaining this data is doing it the wrong way around. A web
> interface to view the data yes, and Chris's package list allows that
> trivially. A web interface to change, don't make sense to me. However, if
> you can convince the other current maintainers, and are willing to
> completely rewrite this when setup handles embedded meta data - such as rpm
> has - then I won't object.

Let's see how my prototype design will look like. I think it's the
best way to "see" what we may do with it and then descide if it is
considered usefull.

Stipe

tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -