Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Fri, 16 Nov 2001 13:17:50 +0100
From:	Corinna Vinschen <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] Updated: bash-2.05a-1
Message-ID:	<20011116131750.C16860@cygbert.vinschen.de>
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<200111161019 DOT fAGAJui15314 AT loony DOT cygnus DOT com> <3BF4F806 DOT C5530DAA AT iee DOT org> <20011116130325 DOT B16860 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
Mime-Version:	1.0
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To:	<20011116130325.B16860@cygbert.vinschen.de>; from cygwin@cygwin.com on Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:03:25PM +0100

On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 01:03:25PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 11:27:02AM +0000, Don Sharp wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> > > 
> > > I've updated the version of bash in cygwin/latest to 2.05a-1.
> > > 
> > > This is the official version 2.05a as announced yesterday on
> > > the Cygwin mailing list by Chet Ramey.
> > > 
> > ... snip ...
> > 
> > I now get
> > 
> > dircolors: no SHELL environment variable, and no shell type option given
> > dircolors: no SHELL environment variable, and no shell type option given
> > 
> > It seems that the new bash doesn't provide dircolors with a SHELL
> > environment variable. Is this a dircolors or bash effect?
> 
> Honestly, I don't know.  I don't even understand the question.
> I'm maintaining bash but I'm using tcsh privatly so I need some
> more hints.  It would even be better you can track that down
> by yourself and then just blame the source of the problem :-)

AFAIK, bash sets $SHELL only if $SHELL isn't already set to
something and if the pw_shell field in the user's /etc/passwd
entry contains... something.  FWIW, that's not new in 2.05a!

Does that help?

Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen                  Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Developer                                mailto:cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat, Inc.

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -