delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
> > > What about existing packages? Specifically, it would be grand if > > > tetex-beta would either get fixed or removed. > > > > IMO, any "released" tagged package should have it's maintainer, who > > decides and tracks done error and bugs. So in ER specification we have > > a [package] n <-> 1 [maintainer] relation. > > We have that, it's just recorded in the list archives :}. And hopefully > soon to be recorded in setup.hint. IMO this should not be recorded > separately from the package metadata (setup.hint). why? if the metadata is held in a database and all setup.hints are generated out of it we have no problems about consistence?! Stipe tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |