delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/15/15:23:57

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
From: Markus Hoenicka <Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-ID: <15348.9449.351000.999290@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 20:26:17 +0000
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?]
In-Reply-To: <m3g07f4xou.fsf@appel.lilypond.org>
References: <F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21 AT hotmail DOT com>
<007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
<20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
<m3n11oth6o DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
<m3k7wr50fa DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
<15348 DOT 5126 DOT 44000 DOT 631380 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL>
<m3g07f4xou DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.94 under Emacs 20.6.1

Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
 > Strange, we haven't had any complaints.  It seemst that MiKTeX
 > installs and runs flawlessly.  Note that, of course, MiKTeX is
 > packaged in a tarball and installed through setup.exe.  Maybe our
 > Windows users are all using that latest software?

Is it really only me running WinNT without IE > 2?

 > > Did you install the teTeX texmf tree?
 > 
 > No, I installed tetex-beta, that's all the tetex that setup.exe will
 > install, right?  That's why we still have to distribute and maitain
 > our own, modified setup.exe and repository (apart from the just lifted
 > package moratorium).
 > 
 > > Just installing Tetex-beta is not enough, as explained by the
 > > Tetex-beta readme.
 > 
 > Yes, I know.  That's why we can't use it.  Users in general won't read
 > READMEs, let alone they would be able to follow simple instructions
 > :-(
 > 
 > The fact that there's a README with instructions, instead of an
 > additional tetex package, for example, tells me that there is some
 > intelligent user-interaction required.
 > 

Now I see. We're talking about semi-intelligent end-users ;-/ I see no
easy way how Cygwin setup.exe could provide a full TeX system unless a
copy of the teTeX texmf tree is made part of the distribution. Would
that be possible?

regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Hoenicka, PhD
UT Houston Medical School
Dept. of Integrative Biology and Pharmacology
6431 Fannin MSB4.114
Houston, TX 77030
(713) 500-6313, -7477
(713) 500-7444 (fax)
Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu
http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hoenicka_markus/


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019