Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BF41EA5.5EEECD2F@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 14:59:33 -0500
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.7 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.8 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Markus Hoenicka <Markus DOT Hoenicka AT uth DOT tmc DOT edu>
CC:	Jan Nieuwenhuizen <janneke AT gnu DOT org>, cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: tetex-beta nitpicking [WAS: Re: no more package moratorium?]
References:	<F224RS8LbyiDFkBfMPA00001d21 AT hotmail DOT com>
	<007f01c16cde$5016de20$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
	<20011114124323 DOT C24614 AT cygbert DOT vinschen DOT de>
	<m3n11oth6o DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org>
	<m3k7wr50fa DOT fsf AT appel DOT lilypond DOT org> <15348 DOT 5126 DOT 44000 DOT 631380 AT gargle DOT gargle DOT HOWL>
X-Virus-Scanned:	by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/)

Markus Hoenicka wrote:
> 
> Jan Nieuwenhuizen writes:
>  > http://lilypond.org/wiki/?TroubleshootingWindows).  We currently use
>  > and distribute MikTeX, because it works reliable, and right out of the
>  > box.
> 
> You can't even install MiKTeX unless you run the latest Windows or the
> latest Internet Explorer.

Are you saying MikTeX only works on WXP?  WRONG.  I've run MikTeX 2.1 on
W98, WNT, W2K (and have no reason to assume it won't work under WMe.) 
Now, I'm not arguing against tetex, but let's confine the arguments to
factual ones, not FUD.

Are you saying MikTeX only works with IE6.0?  Again, WRONG. I've used
MikTeX with IE5.0, 5.5, 5.5sp1, and 5.5sp2.  If you wish to keep your
IE4, then you can download the appropriate DLLs that enable the setup
engine separately -- details given at the MikTeX website.

Again, stick to facts, not FUD.

> 
>  >  But I'd much rather we could use tetex.  Using MikTeX from
>  > cygwin is `cygpath hell'.

I guess.  I've never had many problems.  I use MikTeX + cygwin + make
all the time, and rarely have to resort to cygpath (of course, I usually
build using only relative directories, so D:\\ vs. /cygdrive/d isn't
really an issue for me)

There are arguments in favor of tetex over MikTeX, but the "latest
Windows" or "latest IE" are not among them.

--Chuck

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -