delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/15/11:59:40

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject: Linking to commercial dll's
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.6a January 17, 2001
Message-ID: <OF8B6193A7.B4A10832-ON85256AFF.004E05C7@ipaper.com>
From: "David Westbury" <David DOT Westbury AT ipaper DOT com>
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:10:31 -0500
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on SWMTA1.ipaper.com/IPAPER(Release 5.0.8 |June 18, 2001) at
11/15/2001 10:55:06 AM
MIME-Version: 1.0

I'm attempting to link a C program that I've written to a commercial dll
(non-MS) using gcc in cygwin. I've read about everything I can find about
dll's but I can't seem to make my program access functions in the dll
correctly. My program compiles/links without errors using gcc, and even
runs correctly to some extent. Some functions work, others don't. The
functions that don't work seem to corrupt memory as evidenced by changes in
random variable values. This occurs even when the function return status
indicates success. The commercial package provides a ".dll" file, a ".lib"
file, and a ".h" file. These are obviously intended for use in a Windows
programming environment. I would appreciate if someone knowledgable would
tell me what steps would typically be required to link a program to a well
established commercial dll. For example, what might a typical gcc string
look like? Do gcc switches like "-L", and "-l" apply? Should I be linking
to the .dll or the .lib file?

Dll's seem to be an especially difficult subject in cygwin, requiring
detailed knowlege of the MS way of doing things. Are dll's not
standardized? Is a "cookbook" approach to dll linking not possible? The
issue seems to be a steep hill for an average working programmer, like me,
to climb. This limits the usefulness of cygwin as a programming environment
for me.

BTW, is cygwin intended for MS programmers wanting to explore the Unix
world or is it of more interest to Unix programmers who, like me, have an
occasional need to run Unix programs on Windows?  Programmers coming from
Unix typically won't know much about dll's so a little more introductory
documentation or pointers to such material would seem appropriate for the
cygwin site. I've been to the bookstores and haven't found much help there,
even in Windows programming texts. Apparently dll's simply work correctly
in Windows and require little explanation. One text did say something that
seemed to indicate that I should be linking against the .lib file as it
contains pointers into the .dll fine. This doesn't work for me at all
however.

Here's the gcc string I'm using that results in a partially working
executable:

gcc -g myprog.c  -o myprog  /<path to commercial dll>/filename.dll

Any help or pointers to information would be greatly appreciated.

thanks,
david




--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019