Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: new site for my ports is up
References:	<5314439342 DOT 20011114212805 AT familiehaase DOT de>
	<3BF2D797 DOT B0481987 AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu> <20011114211942 DOT GB9636 AT redhat DOT com>
	<1119104841 DOT 20011114224550 AT familiehaase DOT de>
	<3BF2F6AD DOT 726DB93E AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
	<20011115100549 DOT A1695 AT kahikatea DOT pohutukawa DOT gen DOT nz>
	<032401c16dd1$5a4bbcf0$0200a8c0 AT lifelesswks>
User-Agent:	XEmacs/Gnus
X-Attribution:	Jochen
X-Face:	-%Z4EZ6iY'4m:wiK:!v<f*n1TeWpDxL;vm\2]@7KGXgHzB#JSK#;`z4tYg#7ck/]wrqw6:}
	;vcVMJ0N~%+;N&e,%5phkzeP![#CQ^y^]lyS0Wvp"sV(0$dvw}(12VU<:|q~@MX]S=o46H!(2*%?'k
	Wz-%ul~-hoJL$/SQzy&^?aLj"u9)Lk0zvwmg|#\@U{j:5?C-*{<3que:_Vb AT Ly
X-URL:	http://www.jochen-kuepper.de
In-Reply-To:	<032401c16dd1$5a4bbcf0$0200a8c0@lifelesswks>
From:	"Jochen =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FCpper?=" <jochen AT unc DOT edu>
Organization:	University of North Carolina
Date:	15 Nov 2001 09:56:02 -0500
Message-ID:	<86g07gw0al.fsf@bock.chem.unc.edu>
Lines:	44
MIME-Version:	1.0

On Thu, 15 Nov 2001 23:30:46 +1100 Robert Collins wrote:

Robert> ----- Original Message -----
Robert> From: "John Marshall" <jmarshall AT acm DOT org>

>> Over in RPM land, I have users telling me that they want the

"some users" I hope. Definitely not all:)

>> >> /usr v /usr/local decision to be determined by whether something is
>> package managed (and thus uninstallable via rpm/setup), rather than
>> by whether it happens to come from the vendor.

That's a nice idea...

Robert> Good point.

But I don't think so. After all there is /usr for the vendor,
/usr/local for local stuff, and then there is still /opt and
("sometimes") /usr/local/opt. I think nowadays the best solution is to
put non-vendor non-local stuff into /opt.

And I can live with the current theme that a rpm I download is not
"local". But if it's not from the vendor, it obviousy isn't:)

>> So I get flamed for producing a .rpm that installs to /usr/local, and
>> am probably going to change to /usr because I think they're right.

Well, have you considered /opt?

Robert> I actually don't think that 'off-site' really means much w.r.t. where a
Robert> package installs. 

But it does mean soemthing in regard to where I look for that
package. If I nuke all of /usr but /usr/local and then reinstall the
vendor system, I expect my system to work as before (well, beside
config and such).

Greetings,
Jochen
-- 
Einigkeit und Recht und Freiheit                http://www.Jochen-Kuepper.de
    Liberté, Égalité, Fraternité                GnuPG key: 44BCCD8E
        Sex, drugs and rock-n-roll


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -