Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/15/08:39:31
> Having ports/packages "live" on a separate site for a while, until the
> ports "settle down" enough for the porter/maintainer to be confident of
> them, is okay. I did that for a year or two with cygutils. Eventually,
> I migrated the "important" packages over to the new "official" dist.
I think is is the target of all of us (package maintainers). Offer
packages and then get them cleanly to the "official" distribution.
The only point I have to critic is the lack in tools and mechanisms to
maintain the packages "on the distribution" (site). I would like to
see an integrated web site that focuses on two aims:
1) supporting the (new) users the best way to get what they want,
aka "has someone ported foobar already to Cygwin?!"
2) support the pacakge maintainers, i.e. by having a reference of
all used files and possible file conflicts within a database on the
site. A package maintainer should be able to "check-in" a new release
and roll a regression test on it before it gets publicaly available
and integrated to setup.ini.
> Some stuff cannot be distributed from the cygwin mirror system, for
> legal or political reasons (think cygipc). [BTW, Gerrit, I have NO
> problems with you mirroring the cygipc package. Go ahead. But don't try
> to submit it for inclusion in the official dist, 'cause it won't be
> accepted]
why is that?
Stipe
tolj AT wapme-systems DOT de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: info AT wapme-systems DOT de
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -