Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<ADF57C3C368ED411803C00508BCDF1A559C780@cddkmail.cph.magnus.local>
From:	Peter Ring <pri AT magnus DOT dk>
To:	"'cygwin AT cygwin DOT com'" <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	RE: AW: libxml2.dll, libxslt.dll, problems with executables linke
	d to dll's
Date:	Thu, 15 Nov 2001 10:31:41 +0100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Mailer:	Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
X-MIME-Autoconverted:	from quoted-printable to 8bit by delorie.com id fAF9Yu324902

libxml2/libxslt builds out of the box for me. 
I build from cvs sources.
I have not tried building with shared libraries.

You need recent autoconf/automake/libtool though. 

Canonical site
  http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/

There's a number of libtool ports available:

Gerrit P. Haase
  http://timtowtdi.topcities.com/cygwin/libtool/
Ryan T. Sammartino
 
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/pc/gnuwin32/cygwin/porters/Sammartino_T_Ryan/
Robert Collins
 
http://www.neuro.gatech.edu/users/cwilson/cygutils/robert-collins/contrib/li
btool/

Are there any advantages to any of these?
Are there any advantages to building libtool from the 1.4.2 source?
Will libtool become part of the standard distribution?
Are we waiting for autoconf/automake/libtool to become a bit more
stable?

Kind regards
Peter Ring


-----Original Message-----
From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:freeweb AT nyckelpiga DOT de]
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2001 5:39 PM
To: Ralf Habacker
Cc: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: AW: libxml2.dll, libxslt.dll, problems with executables
linked to dll's


Hallo Ralf,

2001-11-14 17:34:39, du schriebst:

> Hi,
> Do you have tried the already available win32 binaries at
> http://www.fh-frankfurt.de/~igor/projects/libxml/ ?

> I have downloaded it, copied the dlls into /usr/local/bin and made a chown
a+w
> /usr/local/bin/*.dll and called testDocbook. It worked.

Sorry to reply twice, but I wondered why I never heard of this site, now I
know,
there you get win32 binaries, I built them as 'native' Cygwin versions.
That is a great difference!
Cygwin != Windows

If I want to have them for Windows, I would be able to run my MSVC and build
it,
the Windows builds are supported by xmlsoft, there are project files
included in
the source dist, Cygwin is not supported...

Don't mix up the platforms, that is *bad*.

Gerrit
-- 
convey Information Systems GmbH                   http://www.convey.de/
                                                  Vitalisstraße 326-328
Gerrit P. Haase                                   D-50933 Köln
gerrit DOT haase AT convey DOT de                            Fon: ++49 221 6903922


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -