delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Mailing-List: | contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm |
List-Subscribe: | <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Archive: | <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/> |
List-Post: | <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com> |
List-Help: | <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs> |
Sender: | cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Delivered-To: | mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5.1.0.14.0.20011115110210.00a18bc0@192.168.1.1> |
X-Sender: | e AT foobar DOT com (Unverified) |
X-Mailer: | QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 |
Date: | Thu, 15 Nov 2001 11:08:36 +1100 |
To: | cygwin AT cygwin DOT com |
From: | E <evsub AT deathsdoor DOT com> |
Subject: | Re: no more package moratorium? |
Mime-Version: | 1.0 |
Robert Collins wrote: >I agree. They must also *At this point* agree to maintain the package do >upgrades feed patches to the vendor etc, and that they will announce >publicly if they decide to stop maintaining the package with as much >warning as possible. Packages with no maintainers are pulled after 3 >months. And perhaps put a big "[UNMAINTAINED]" on the start of the description for that three months to perhaps prompt an enterprising soul to take it up? (Or at least as a warning of it's immanent departure :-) ) E. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |