delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi   search  
Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/02/00:45:47

Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe: <mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post: <mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help: <mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To: mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2001 00:44:47 -0500
From: Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject: Re: setup test #4
Message-ID: <20011102004447.B26975@redhat.com>
Reply-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To: cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References: <1004677947 DOT 5402 DOT 98 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011102001943 DOT A26768 AT redhat DOT com> <1004678683 DOT 5402 DOT 104 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011102002907 DOT B26768 AT redhat DOT com> <1004679576 DOT 5558 DOT 113 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011102004118 DOT A26951 AT redhat DOT com> <1004679933 DOT 5367 DOT 117 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
Mime-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1004679933.5367.117.camel@lifelesswks>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:45:32PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:39:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:24:42PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
>> >> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>> >> >>>The long term goal for source downloads is to let them be selected
>> >> >>>separately from the binaries, either as separate source packages, or as
>> >> >>>a completely independent spin control where the current src box it.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>Yay!
>> >> >
>> >> >Now, if only someone would code this.
>> >> 
>> >> The separate source packages should be relatively easy.  They could
>> >> just be another package, right?  So you'd see something like:
>> >> 
>> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1
>> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1-src
>> >> 
>> >> I guess you could have a separate "Source" category, too, although
>> >> that would complicate setup.ini parsing a bit.
>> >
>> >That part wouldn't, you'd simply put the package into the Source
>> >category.
>
>          ^programmatically^.

Ah.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -


  webmaster     delorie software   privacy  
  Copyright © 2019   by DJ Delorie     Updated Jul 2019