Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup test #4
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20011102004118.A26951@redhat.com>
References:	<1004677947 DOT 5402 DOT 98 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20011102001943 DOT A26768 AT redhat DOT com> <1004678683 DOT 5402 DOT 104 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20011102002907 DOT B26768 AT redhat DOT com> <1004679576 DOT 5558 DOT 113 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<20011102004118 DOT A26951 AT redhat DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release)
Date:	02 Nov 2001 16:45:32 +1100
Message-Id:	<1004679933.5367.117.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Nov 2001 05:49:47.0958 (UTC) FILETIME=[2E67BD60:01C16362]

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:41, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:39:35PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:24:42PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >> >>>The long term goal for source downloads is to let them be selected
> >> >>>separately from the binaries, either as separate source packages, or as
> >> >>>a completely independent spin control where the current src box it.
> >> >>
> >> >>Yay!
> >> >
> >> >Now, if only someone would code this.
> >> 
> >> The separate source packages should be relatively easy.  They could
> >> just be another package, right?  So you'd see something like:
> >> 
> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1
> >> cygwin-1.3.3-1-src
> >> 
> >> I guess you could have a separate "Source" category, too, although
> >> that would complicate setup.ini parsing a bit.
> >
> >That part wouldn't, you'd simply put the package into the Source
> >category.

          ^programmatically^.
 Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -