Mail Archives: cygwin/2001/11/02/00:36:23
On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:29, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:24:42PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 16:19, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> >>>The long term goal for source downloads is to let them be selected
> >>>separately from the binaries, either as separate source packages, or as
> >>>a completely independent spin control where the current src box it.
> >>
> >>Yay!
> >
> >Now, if only someone would code this.
>
> The separate source packages should be relatively easy. They could
> just be another package, right? So you'd see something like:
>
> cygwin-1.3.3-1
> cygwin-1.3.3-1-src
>
> I guess you could have a separate "Source" category, too, although
> that would complicate setup.ini parsing a bit.
That part wouldn't, you'd simply put the package into the Source
category.
> You could also have something like a "View Source" button which toggles
> whether source was selected or not although that might just be too
> many buttons...
Thats one of the issues.
Here's my off-top-of-head list....
1) For GPL and user friendliness, I should be able to pick a package
foo, and get the source for it, for any version I can download at a
given time.
2) Source's shouldn't clutter the display for the average user.
3) Source's have their own dependencies, and they should be (optionally)
grabbed automatically. I.E. grabbing vim-src grabs ncurses-dev for the
headers.
4) Sources can be associated with more than one package. So grabbing the
source for any of ncurses, libncurses, ncurses-dev downloads the same
source.
5) Any .spec/dsc/diff files should also be associated automatically.
So theres a bunch of little tasks that need to be done.
Rob
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- Raw text -