Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Subject:	Re: Re[2]: setup testers wanted
From:	Robert Collins <robert DOT collins AT itdomain DOT com DOT au>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
In-Reply-To:	<20011101205025.A6760@redhat.com>
References:	<1004622067 DOT 3342 DOT 30 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<1381809501 DOT 20011101100915 AT earthlink DOT net>
	<1004657351 DOT 4644 DOT 7 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<1004658066 DOT 4644 DOT 15 DOT camel AT lifelesswks>
	<7825503011 DOT 20011101164409 AT earthlink DOT net>
	<1004663375 DOT 5083 DOT 12 DOT camel AT lifelesswks> <20011101205025 DOT A6760 AT redhat DOT com>
X-Mailer:	Evolution/0.15 (Preview Release)
Date:	02 Nov 2001 14:57:03 +1100
Message-Id:	<1004673424.5367.66.camel@lifelesswks>
Mime-Version:	1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	02 Nov 2001 04:01:19.0369 (UTC) FILETIME=[06FBDF90:01C16353]

On Fri, 2001-11-02 at 12:50, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 12:09:34PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
> >How about we get rid of either 'skip' or 'keep' - they are the same
> >AFAIK.
> 
> We had this discussion in cygwin-developers.  They are subtly different.
> One implies that the package exists on disk and you'll be keeping it.
> The other implies that you will not be installing the package.

Sure, but will users grok this?

Hmm, maybe we shouldn't show skip for non installed packages?

Rob


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -