Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sun, 28 Oct 2001 18:01:28 -0500
From:	Christopher Faylor <cgf AT redhat DOT com>
To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: Process Forking
Message-ID:	<20011028180128.D23959@redhat.com>
Reply-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Mail-Followup-To:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
References:	<3BDC5FB5 DOT 5000108 AT Blueyonder DOT co DOT uk>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<3BDC5FB5.5000108@Blueyonder.co.uk>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.3.21i

On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:42:45PM +0000, Jonathan Boler wrote:
>When I use "mozilla.exe &" to start mozilla or any other process, 
>another bash.exe process is spawned too. The documentation seems to 
>indicate that this extra bash process should terminate before the 
>mozilla process has finished.

If mozilla.exe is not a cygwin process then another cygwin process is
required to act as a "stub" when a non-cygwin process execed.  In this
case the "stub" is bash.exe.

>Is this correct or should there be an extra bash process for every 
>process that I start using the &?

Only for non-cygwin processes.

>If so then it is a bit annoying. I am running win2k.

Sigh.

cgf

--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -