Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BCD3D01.9050509@ece.gatech.edu>
Date:	Wed, 17 Oct 2001 04:10:41 -0400
From:	Charles Wilson <cwilson AT ece DOT gatech DOT edu>
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.2) Gecko/20010726 Netscape6/6.1
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Fergus <fergus AT bonhard DOT uklinux DOT net>
CC:	cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Subject:	Re: setup.exe v.2.78.2.13 and setup.ini 1003284004
References:	<000b01c156da$c1de11a0$6fc82486 AT medschool DOT dundee DOT ac DOT uk>

It's an oops in the setup.ini.  It'll be fixed soon.

--Chuck


Fergus wrote:

> Ow. I usually trust setup.exe and setup.ini like they were the creations of
> gods, but the latest trip to www.cygwin.com to look for updates invites me
> just to un-install all 3 of newlib-man, tetex-beta and w32api. Is this
> right? The site gave me a new setup.exe v.2.78.2.13 and (I notice) setup.ini
> has
> 
> setup-timestamp: 1003284004
> setup-version: 2.78.2.11
> 
> So for the moment I've just used <Cancel> at this point in the update.
> 
> Fergus
> 
> 
> --
> Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
> Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
> Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
> FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/
> 
> 



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -