Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Date:	Sat, 13 Oct 2001 12:32:37 +1100
From:	"Alexandr V. Shutko" <AVShutko AT mail DOT khstu DOT ru>
X-Mailer:	The Bat! (v1.48c) Personal
Reply-To:	"Alexandr V.Shutko" <AVShutko AT mail DOT khstu DOT ru>
Organization:	KhSTU
X-Priority:	3 (Normal)
Message-ID:	<1147140217.20011013123237@mail.khstu.ru>
To:	egor duda <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	Re[2]: [AVShutko AT mail DOT khstu DOT ru: Re: BUG in sendto() function]
In-reply-To:	<138167630259.20011011140809@logos-m.ru>
References:	<20011010002737 DOT B16038 AT redhat DOT com>
	<16470545989 DOT 20011010111003 AT logos-m DOT ru>
	<148618535106 DOT 20011011155732 AT mail DOT khstu DOT ru>
	<138167630259 DOT 20011011140809 AT logos-m DOT ru>
Mime-Version:	1.0

Hello egor duda,
Thursday, October 11, 2001, 9:08:09 PM, you wrote:

ed> Gosh, it looks like i was just plain stupid yesterday when i was
ed> looking at the code. everything is simpler than i thought.
ed> get_inet_addr works ok, the problem is nobody uses data it returns.
ed> i've just checked in the simple fix. you can either update sources
ed> from cvs and rebuild or wait for next snapshot. 
There was no new snapshots so i rebuild it by myself :) All works
ok... I tried fresh-compiled IServerd on heavy load and it is work
fine...

ed> Be warned, however, that there still is a problem with recvfrom() on
ed> AF_UNIX socket. recvfrom() is supposed to return peer address...
I think program that use recvfrom with datagram unix domain sockets
already know peer address :) I didn't ever seen programs that use
address structure from recvfrom in such situations....


P.S. Why don't you implement ualarm function in cygwin ?

####################################################################
u_int ualarm (u_int value, u_int interval)
{                                                                     
  struct itimerval timer, otimer;                                     
                                                                        
  timer.it_value.tv_sec = 0;                                          
  timer.it_value.tv_usec = value;                                     
  timer.it_interval.tv_sec = 0;                                       
  timer.it_interval.tv_usec = interval;                               
                                                                        
  if (setitimer (ITIMER_REAL, &timer, &otimer) < 0) return (u_int)-1;                                                 
                                                                  
  return (otimer.it_value.tv_sec * 1000000) + otimer.it_value.tv_usec;
}
####################################################################

-- 
With respect,
Alexandr V. Shutko                           mailto:AVShutko AT mail DOT khstu DOT ru



--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -