Mailing-List:	contact cygwin-help AT sourceware DOT cygnus DOT com; run by ezmlm
List-Subscribe:	<mailto:cygwin-subscribe AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Archive:	<http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/>
List-Post:	<mailto:cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>
List-Help:	<mailto:cygwin-help AT sources DOT redhat DOT com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender:	cygwin-owner AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Delivered-To:	mailing list cygwin AT sources DOT redhat DOT com
Message-ID:	<3BC76CD8.7090305@home.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:21:12 -0400
From:	"David A. Cobb" <superbiskit AT home DOT com>
Organization:	Excite/At-Home User via Cox
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20010913
X-Accept-Language:	en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Cygwin Library General Discussion <cygwin AT cygwin DOT com>
Subject:	More about slowing down the machine
X-Priority:	2 (high)

Win98se (4.10.2222) en_US; Cygwin1.dll 1.3.4s (2001-10-11 [I think]).

I was attempting another build last p.m. and, to get a handle on the 
slowdown reported in 
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-08/msg00988.html
I ran Windows Taskinfo while it was processing.

./configure went fine [along with everything it called]

As soon as MAKE started, the time anomalies began.  Watching the 
statistics with the running procedure stack:
rxvt->WINOA386->bash->VM:->bash.2->make.1->sh.1->make.2->sh.2->gcc
it appears that a lot of time is spent in *make.2*.  Since that process 
[I think] should simply be waiting for *sh.2* to complete, this looks 
like a spin-lock to me.

To repeat, when the anomaly is happening Windows is unable to track the 
mouse and the Windows clock is being updated at about 1/4 speed.  The 
build started at 18:30 - and the clock was right - and ended at 21:00 
with the clock reading 19:05.  Somehow the message queue(s) aren't being 
checked and "pre-emptive scheduling" isn't very much so.

I would like to help track this down instead of bitching all the time. 
How should I instrument this, since it's all wrapped up like an onion? 
If make builds OOTB, I suppose I could compile it with profiling.  Would 
that help?  Strace would probably show something useful - the problem 
would be to find who to trace and monkey about with the makefiles so it 
happens: bleaghh.

Any wise suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
-- 
David A. Cobb, Software Engineer, Public Access Advocate, All around 
nice guy.
New PGP key 09/13/2001:
:<http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=superbiskit&\
fingerprint=on>
:<http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=superbiskit&\
fingerprint=on>
Fingerprint=0x{E7C6_4EE2_6B75_5BA3_C52E__77FA_63C3_9366_DCFB_229B}
"By God's Grace I am a Christian man, by my actions a great sinner."
--The Way of a Pilgrim, R. M. French [tr.]
Potentially Viral Software is any software for which you are not allowed
to examine the source.  Do not buy or use Potentially Viral Software!


--
Unsubscribe info:      http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting:         http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation:         http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:                   http://cygwin.com/faq/

- Raw text -